MIDTRIMESTER AMNIOCENTESIS - SUBJECTIVE MATERNAL RESPONSES
- 1 January 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Vol. 26 (1) , 10-16
Abstract
Studies, through questionnaire and interview, of couples who elect or decline midtrimester amniocentesis demonstrate that both groups cope well with new decisions surrounding this procedure. The pregnancy monitored by genetic amniocentesis does not appear to receive special status as viewed by the parents, nor is the developing fetus placed in a special category during the pregnancy. In this series, the potential risk of fetal injury in both groups was of greater concern than that of spontaneous abortion as a result of amniocentesis. Waiting for laboratory results from amniocentesis, although quite stressful, does not result in denial of the pregnancy. Approximately 1/3 of the couples who elected to undergo amniocentesis remained uncertain that they would terminate pregnancy if a defective fetus was found. Some couples who already have 1 child with a birth defect diagnosable by amniocentesis will decline to undergo the procedure during a subsequent pregnancy.This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sixteen years' experience of counselling, diagnosis, and prenatal detection in one genetic centre: progress, results, and problems.Journal of Medical Genetics, 1979
- Guidelines for the Ethical, Social and Legal Issues in Prenatal DiagnosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1979
- Prenatal Genetic Diagnosis in 3000 AmniocentesesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1979
- Diagnosis of Homozygous α-Thalassemia in Cultured Amniotic-Fluid FibroblastsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978
- Participants' reaction to amniocentesis and prenatal genetic studiesJAMA, 1977
- PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS OF β-THALASSÆMIA AND SICKLE-CELL ANÆMIAThe Lancet, 1977
- FETAL PUNCTURE DURING MIDTRIMESTER AMNIOCENTESIS1977
- ULTRASONOGRAPHY PRECEDING DIAGNOSTIC AMNIOCENTESIS AND ITS EFFECT ON AMNIOTIC-FLUID CELL-GROWTH1977
- Prenatal Diagnosis of HemoglobinopathiesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1976