Attributional Egocentrism Following Performance of a Competitive Task
- 1 August 1977
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Social Psychology
- Vol. 102 (2) , 215-222
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1977.9713267
Abstract
A field study questionnaire examined the attributional patterns of males and females (N = 153 ages 11 to 58) who previously had won or lost tennis matches. Consistent with laboratory findings of attributional egocentrism, winning as compared to losing Ss attributed their performance more to internal facilitating factors (personal effort and ability) and less to internal debilitating factors (e.g., lack of practice). Sex differences indicated females took greater personal responsibility for a win than a loss, but also denied total responsibility by emphasizing the importance of luck more after a win than loss, suggesting a “fear of success” conflict. Males, on the other hand, employed less direct modes to achieve accountability for success and unaccountability for failure.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Responsibility attribution in groups and individuals: A direct test of the diffusion of responsibility hypothesis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975
- Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction?Psychological Bulletin, 1975
- Effects of cooperation and competition on responsibility attribution after success and failureJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1973
- Effect of anticipated performance on the attributions of causality to self and others.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973
- Toward An Understanding of Achievement‐Related Conflicts in WomenJournal of Social Issues, 1972
- Note on Evans and Anastasio on the analysis of covariance.Psychological Bulletin, 1970
- The psychology of interpersonal relations.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1958