Political Coerciveness and Turmoil
- 1 August 1970
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Law & Society Review
- Vol. 5 (1) , 93-118
- https://doi.org/10.2307/3053074
Abstract
The central theme of this paper concerns the difficult question of whether the use of force, and, generally, the coercive character of a political regime stimulates or inhibits the occurrence of political strife and violence. More specifically, two questions are raised: First, what is the relationship between the degree of regime coerciveness and the amount of violence experienced within political systems? Second, in what way does the consistency or inconsistency with which force is applied affect internal political stability and turmoil?Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Scalogram Analysis of Political ViolenceComparative Political Studies, 1969
- A Causal Model of Civil Strife: A Comparative Analysis Using New IndicesAmerican Political Science Review, 1968
- Political Instability in Latin America: The Cross-Cultural Test of a Causal ModelPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1967
- Aggressive behaviors within polities, 1948-1962: a cross - national study 1Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1966
- Freedom in the World's Press: A Fresh Appraisal with New DataJournalism Quarterly, 1965
- Inequality and Instability: The Relation of Land Tenure to PoliticsWorld Politics, 1964
- The psychology of aggression.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1961
- Dimensions of freedom: An analysis.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1961
- Anti-European violence in Africa: a comparative analysisJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1959
- Frustration and aggression.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1939