Genotoxicity of inhibitors of DNA topoisomerases I (camptothecin) and II (m-AMSA) in vivo and in vitro
- 1 January 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Mutagenesis
- Vol. 5 (6) , 541-547
- https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/5.6.541
Abstract
The present study was designed to determine and compare the clastogenicity of m-AMSA and camptothecin (CAMP) in vivo in mouse bone marrow and peripheral blood lympho–cytes (PBLs), and in vitro in mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells. m-AMSA interferes with topoisomerase II to induce double-strand DNA breaks. CAMP interferes with topoisomerase I to induce single-strand DNA breaks. Thus, we expected the two drugs to induce different types of chromosomal aberra–tions (CAs). However, both drugs produced quantitatively and qualitatively similar numbers and types of aberrations under similar experimental conditions. In mouse bone marrow exposed over an 18-h period, both drugs (3 mg/kg) induced ∼30 damaged cells, with an average of 0.4 chromatid breaks per cell (in 100 cells analyzed/mouse). In addition, both drugs induced only chromatid-type aberrations in mouse bone marrow in vivo when exposure occurred during G2. Cell cycle specificity was indicated by the absence of CAs when exposure to the drugs occurred in vivo in mouse PBLs during Go In L5178Y cells, m-AMSA was considerably more potent for the induction of mutations and somewhat more potent for the induction of CAs than CAMP was. In contrast to the in vivo bone marrow results, the drugs induced high levels of both chromatid- and chromosome–type aberra–tions in vitro. The ultimate types of chromosomal damage induced by m-AMSA and CAMP result from a complex interaction of (0 cell cycle specific variations in topoisomerase enzyme levels, (ii) the abilities of these drugs to interfere with the orderly DNA breakage/reunion associated with topo–isomerase activity, and (iii) the processing of the damage resulting from these interactions.This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mechanism of antitumor drug action: poisoning of mammalian DNA topoisomerase II on DNA by 4'-(9-acridinylamino)-methanesulfon-m-anisidide.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1984
- Improved sister-chromatid differentiation using paraffin-coated bromodeoxyuridine tablets in miceMutation Research Letters, 1983
- Cytogenetic distinction between the TK+ and TK− chromosomes in the L5178Y TK+ / − 3.7.2C mouse-lymphoma cell lineMutation Research Letters, 1982
- A comparison of adriamycin and mAMSA in vitro: Cell lethality and SCE studiesBritish Journal of Cancer, 1981
- Cytogenetic analysis of the L5178Y/TK+/− → TK−/− mouse lymphoma mutagenesis assay systemMutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis, 1981
- Sister-chromatid exchanges: A report of the GENE-TOX programMutation Research/Reviews in Genetic Toxicology, 1981
- Molecular mechanisms involved in the production of cromosomal aberrations II. Utilization of neurospora endonuclease for the study of aberration production by X-rays in G1 and G2 stages of the cell cycleMutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis, 1980
- Cell-Cycle-Specific Chromosome Damage Following Treatment of Cultured Chinese Hamster Cells With 4′-[(9-Acridinyl-amino] methanesulphon-m-anisidide-HCl2JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1978
- Evidence for chemically-induced structural gene mutations at the thymidine kinase locus in cultured L5178Y mouse lymphoma cellsMutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis, 1977
- A simplified technique for in vivo analysis of sister-chromatid exchanges using 5-bromodeoxyuridine tabletsCytogenetic and Genome Research, 1977