Limitations of echocardiography in the assessment of left ventricular size and function in aortic regurgitation.
- 1 January 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 61 (1) , 148-155
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.61.1.148
Abstract
The optimal timing for prosthetic valve replacement in patients with aortic regurgitation (AR) depends on the identification of left ventricular (LV) enlargement and dysfunction. Whether this goal could be achieved reliably by echocardiography was evaluated in 22 patients with pure or dominant AR (AR group) in whom echocardiographic LV dimensions and performance indices were compared to corresponding dimension, volume and performance data obtained by single-plane and biplane angiography. Echocardiographic and single-plane angiographic comparisons were made in 18 patients with diseases other than AR (non-AR group). In the AR group, there was a moderately close correlation between the echocardiographic dimensions and single-plane right anterior oblique (RAO) angiographic volume (r [correlation coefficient] = 0.80; P < 0.001). The standard error of estimate was large (SEE .+-. 60 ml) and did not justify the use of a regression formula for calculating LV volume from echocardiographic dimension in individual patients. Substituting biplane for RAO angiographic volume did not improve the correlation (r = 0.78, SEE .+-. 63 ml, P < 0.001). In these patients, the echocardiographic calculation of LV ejection phase indices compared unfavorably with corresponding RAO (r = 0.31-0.38; P = NS [not significant]), left anterior oblique (r = 0.54-0.56; P < 0.05) and biplane angiographic data (r = 0.53, 0.54; P < 0.05). Comparison between echocardiographic dimensions and RAO angiographic volumes in the non-AR group exhibited a higher degree of correlation (r = 0.94; P < 0.001) and the SEE was half that seen in the AR group (P < 0.001). There was a clinically satisfactory correlation between echocardiographic and RAO angiographic indices of LV function (r = 0.81-0.84; P < 0.001). Single echocardiographic measurements of LV dimensions and function indices are clinically unsatisfactory and potentially misleading in patients with AR. This discrepancy may be related to the altered geometric configuration of the enlarged chamber in this disease state.This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- The use of biplane angiocardiography for the measurement of left ventricular volume in manPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Chronic aortic regurgitation: the effect of aortic valve replacement on left ventricular volume, mass and function.Circulation, 1978
- Anterior left ventricular wall echoes in coronary artery disease: Linear scanning with a single element transducerThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1974
- Relation of left ventricular shape, function and wall stress in manThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1974
- Echocardiographic determination of left ventricular dimensions, volumes and performanceThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1972
- Natural History of Rheumatic Aortic RegurgitationCirculation, 1971
- The effect of rest and physical effort on the left ventricular burden in mitral and aortic regurgitationAmerican Heart Journal, 1970
- The mitral complexAmerican Heart Journal, 1968
- Estimation of Left Ventricular Volume by One-Plane CineangiographyCirculation, 1967
- Hemodynamic Consequences of the Injection of Radiopaque MaterialCirculation, 1965