Virtual sounding boards: How deliberative is on‐line political discussion?
- 1 September 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Information, Communication & Society
- Vol. 1 (3) , 313-338
- https://doi.org/10.1080/13691189809358972
Abstract
Emerging forums in cyberspace, accessible using advanced teletechnologies, augur new public and political spaces. A content analysis was conducted of a random sample of postings to Usenet newsgroups, self‐identified as political, to ascertain the extent to which they are being used for democratic deliberation. The results show that these gathering places are, in general, home to an array of overlapping, short‐lived conversations, usually among like‐minded individuals. Sustained deliberation is rare in these forums which means that, as currently designed and used, they may not be effective sounding boards for signalling and expounding issues and problems to be processed by government.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Why conversation is not the soul of democracyCritical Studies in Mass Communication, 1997
- Creating a Democratic Public Sphere Through Political DiscussionSocial Science Computer Review, 1996
- Electronic Mail and the Reinvigoration of American DemocracySocial Science Computer Review, 1996
- Network rules of order: regulating speech in public electronic foraMedia, Culture & Society, 1996
- The ingroup overexclusion effect: Identity concerns in decisions about group membershipEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 1995
- The Politics of Citizen Access TechnologyPolicy Studies Journal, 1992
- Political Science Research on TeledemocracySocial Science Computer Review, 1992
- Group decision making and communication technologyOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1992
- The Rational Choice Approach to Politics: A Challenge to Democratic TheoryThe Review of Politics, 1991
- Political identity and perceived intragroup homogeneityBritish Journal of Social Psychology, 1989