Uniqueness does not Imply Identification
- 1 November 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Sociological Methods & Research
- Vol. 14 (2) , 155-163
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124185014002003
Abstract
Many authors suggest that conditions originally presented by Howe (1955) and later by Jöreskog (1979) are sufficient to identify confirmatory factor analysis models. In this note we show that these are sufficient conditions for unique factor loadings under rotation but they are not sufficient for model identification. This is demonstrated with an extended example.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Application of the EM MethodSociological Methods & Research, 1984
- Multivariate Analysis with Latent Variables: Causal ModelingAnnual Review of Psychology, 1980
- Structures of Well-BeingSociological Methods & Research, 1979
- Rotational Equivalence of Factor Loading Matrices with Specified ValuesPsychometrika, 1978
- Structure of Well-BeingSociological Methods & Research, 1978
- Structural Equation ModelsAnnual Review of Sociology, 1977
- Estimation and Hypothesis Testing in Linear Models Containing Measurement ErrorSociological Methods & Research, 1976
- Identification and Estimation in Path Analysis with Unmeasured VariablesAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1973
- A Note on a Sufficiency Condition for Uniqueness of a Restricted Factor MatrixPsychometrika, 1973
- A General Approach to Confirmatory Maximum Likelihood Factor AnalysisPsychometrika, 1969