Interrelations Between Amplitude, Latency, Rise Time, and the Edelberg Recovery Measure of the Galvanic Skin Response
- 1 July 1972
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Psychophysiology
- Vol. 9 (4) , 437-442
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1972.tb01791.x
Abstract
This report describes relationships between the Edelberg recovery measure, latency, rise time, and amplitude measures of GSR response to cued, uncued, and disparity USs. Under cued and uncued conditions all temporal measures were independent of amplitude. Rise time and recovery measures were highly correlated under all conditions, while correlations between latency and rise time or amplitude were quite weak, suggesting that latency and rise time‐recovery are partly under the control of different mechanisms. When US was unexpected (disparity), latency remained independent of amplitude, but significant correlations developed between amplitude and the temporal measures of rise time and recovery. Latency and recovery, but not rise time or amplitude, distinguished between disparity and non‐disparity conditions. The results demonstrate the need and utility for more complete response specification.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- THE GSR RECOVERY LIMB IN CHRONIC SCHIZOPHRENIAPsychophysiology, 1970
- THE INFORMATION CONTENT OF THE RECOVERY LIMB OF THE ELECTRODERMAL RESPONSEPsychophysiology, 1970
- COMMENTS REGARDING MULTIPLE RESPONSE PHENOMENA IN LONG INTERSTIMULUS INTERVAL CONDITIONINGPsychophysiology, 1966
- Response of cutaneous water barrier to ideational stimulation: A GSR component.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1966
- Preparatory set variables related to classical conditioning of autonomic responses.Psychological Review, 1960
- The relationship between direction and amount of stimulus change and amount of perceptual disparity response.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1960