The Piper's Dance: A Paradigm of the Collective Response to Epidemic Disease
- 1 August 1993
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters
- Vol. 11 (2) , 227-245
- https://doi.org/10.1177/028072709301100205
Abstract
A content analysis of the literature on epidemics, with particular reference to the American experience with AIDS, reveals the natural history of the response of endangered populations to epidemics. The paradigm contains four sequential phases: discernment, in which the threatened society becomes cognizant of the presence of a spreading lethal infection; a collective trauma with symptoms similar to other natural and man-made disasters and attended by denial, epidemic phobia, scapegoating and retribution guilt; avoidance behavior ruled by rational attempts to lessen the risk of contagion; and recovery, in which survivors enabled by biological immunity or medical technology witness the abatement of the epidemic. Though they have distinctive traits, epidemics illustrate the essential dynamics that mark natural and technological disasters.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Rise and Fall of Social Problems: A Public Arenas ModelAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1988
- Mobilization and Participation: Social-Psychological Expansisons of Resource Mobilization TheoryAmerican Sociological Review, 1984
- The psychological impact of AIDS on gay men.American Psychologist, 1984
- Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial TheoryAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1977
- Insurgency of the Powerless: Farm Worker Movements (1946-1972)American Sociological Review, 1977
- Medicine as an Institution of Social ControlSociological Review, 1972
- Blame and Hostility in DisasterAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1957
- The Nature and Conditions of PanicAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1954
- The Revolutionary Process: A Frame of Reference for the Study of Revolutionary MovementsSocial Forces, 1950
- The Natural History of a Social ProblemAmerican Sociological Review, 1941