Gender Differences in the Treatment of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction
- 8 March 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of internal medicine (1960)
- Vol. 153 (5) , 625-629
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1993.00410050061008
Abstract
Objective: As part of a community-wide study examining temporal trends in the incidence and survival rates of acute myocardial infarction, we examined differences between the sexes in overall utilization rates and changes over time, therein, of various therapies used in the management of acute myocardial infarction. Design: Nonconcurrent prospective study. Patients: Three thousand three hundred sixty-one men and 2119 women hospitalized with validated acute myocardial infarction in 16 hospitals in the Worcester, Mass, metropolitan area during 1975, 1978, 1981, 1984, 1986, 1988, and 1990. Results: After controlling, by means of a logistic regression analysis, for a variety of patient-related factors that could affect physician prescribing patterns, women were significantly more likely to receive diuretics during hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction, whereas men were significantly more likely to receive antiplatelet agents, lidocaine, and other antiarrhythmic agents. No statistically significant differences were seen between men and women with regard to the use of anticoagulants, β-blockers, calcium channel blockers, digoxin, nitrates, and thrombolytic agents. Marked increases over time (1975 through 1990) were seen in the use of anticoagulants, antiplatelet agents, β-blockers, lidocaine, and nitrates in each of the sexes, while declines were seen in the use of digoxin and diuretics. Use of thrombolytic therapy increased between 1986 and 1990, whereas use of calcium channel blockers decreased over this period for both men and women. Conclusions: The results of this multihospital, population-based, observational study suggest that physician practice patterns in the pharmacologic treatment of men and women hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction are very similar. (Arch Intern Med. 1993;153:625-629)This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Selection of Patients for Coronary Angiography and Coronary Revascularization Early after Myocardial Infarction: Is There Evidence for a Gender Bias?Annals of Internal Medicine, 1992
- Underutilization of thrombolytic therapy in eligible women with acute myocardial infarctionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1991
- Differences in the Use of Procedures between Women and Men Hospitalized for Coronary Heart DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Randomized trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-2Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1988
- Overview of results of randomized clinical trials in heart disease. I. Treatments following myocardial infarctionPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1988
- Incidence and case fatality rates of acute myocardial infarction (1975–1984): The Worcester Heart Attack StudyAmerican Heart Journal, 1988
- Trends in physician management of uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction, 1970 to 1987The American Journal of Cardiology, 1988
- Non-Q wave myocardial infarction: Recent changes in occurrence and prognosis—a community-wide perspectiveAmerican Heart Journal, 1987
- Recent changes in attack and survival rates of acute myocardial infarction (1975 through 1981). The Worcester Heart Attack StudyJAMA, 1986
- Physician practice in the management of patients with uncomplicated myocardial infarction: changes in the past decade.Circulation, 1982