Is the influence of acquiescence on “catchphrase” type attitude scale items not so mythical after all?
- 1 August 1979
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Australian Journal of Psychology
- Vol. 31 (2) , 73-78
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00049537908254651
Abstract
It is argued that the inherent ambiguity of the one‐word items in the Wilson C‐scale might make them particularly subject to acquiescent responding. When administered in classroom settings there is already some evidence that the Wilson scale is so affected. In a study of 110 Australian Army conscripts, the Wilson scale was found to show a correlation between its radical and conservative items of only ‐.199. Scored without reversals, it made an acquiescence scale with a reliability of .61. In a second study with 126 Australian Army officers, a revised C‐scale was used but the equivalent statistics were still‐.226 and .60. It is concluded that the Wilson scale may be valid and acquiescence‐free only when personal help is given with the answering of each item.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Similarities and differences in social attitudes in four Western countries1International Journal of Psychology, 1978
- The Conservatism Scale: Independent of SD?British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1973
- Are Conservatism Scales Irreversible?British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1972
- ‘A New Measure of Conservatism’: its LimitationsBritish Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1971
- Using Balanced Scales to Control AcquiescenceSociometry, 1970
- A New Measure of Conservatism*British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1968
- Authoritarianism scales and response bias.Psychological Bulletin, 1966
- The great response-style myth.Psychological Bulletin, 1965
- Acquiescence—Measurement and Theory*British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1964
- Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of testsPsychometrika, 1951