The Effect of Nisoldipine as Compared with Enalapril on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes and Hypertension
Open Access
- 5 March 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 338 (10) , 645-652
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199803053381003
Abstract
Background It has recently been reported that the use of calcium-channel blockers for hypertension may be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular complications. Because this issue remains controversial, we studied the incidence of such complications in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and hypertension who were randomly assigned to treatment with either the calcium-channel blocker nisoldipine or the angiotensin-converting–enzyme inhibitor enalapril as part of a larger study. Methods The Appropriate Blood Pressure Control in Diabetes (ABCD) Trial is a prospective, randomized, blinded trial comparing the effects of moderate control of blood pressure (target diastolic pressure, 80 to 89 mm Hg) with those of intensive control of blood pressure (target diastolic pressure, 75 mm Hg) on the incidence and progression of complications of diabetes. The study also compared nisoldipine with enalapril as a first-line antihypertensive agent in terms of the prevention and progression of complications of diabetes. In the current study, we analyzed data on a secondary end point (the incidence of myocardial infarction) in the subgroup of patients in the ABCD Trial who had hypertension. Results Analysis of the 470 patients in the trial who had hypertension (base-line diastolic blood pressure, >90 mm Hg) showed similar control of blood pressure, blood glucose and lipid concentrations, and smoking behavior in the nisoldipine group (235 patients) and the enalapril group (235 patients) throughout five years of follow-up. Using a multiple logistic-regression model with adjustment for cardiac risk factors, we found that nisoldipine was associated with a higher incidence of fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarctions (a total of 25) than enalapril (total, 5) (risk ratio, 9.5; 95 percent confidence interval, 2.3 to 21.4). Conclusions In this population of patients with diabetes and hypertension, we found a significantly higher incidence of fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction among those assigned to therapy with the calcium-channel blocker nisoldipine than among those assigned to receive enalapril. Since our findings are based on a secondary end point, they will require confirmation.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Management of Chronic Heart FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Effects of ACE inhibitors on renal function in incipient and overt diabetic nephropathyJournal of Diabetes and its Complications, 1996
- Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibition in Type I Diabetic NephropathyPublished by S. Karger AG ,1995
- Trends in pharmacologic management of hypertension in the United StatesArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1995
- ISIS-4: A randomised factorial trial assessing early oral captopril, oral mononitrate, and intravenous magnesium sulphate in 58 050 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarctionThe Lancet, 1995
- Effect of Captopril on Mortality and Morbidity in Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction after Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Effect of Enalapril on Mortality and the Development of Heart Failure in Asymptomatic Patients with Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection FractionsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Cause-specific mortality in a population-based study of diabetes.American Journal of Public Health, 1991
- Effects of Enalapril on Mortality in Severe Congestive Heart FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Mortality and survival in Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitusDiabetologia, 1987