Different Diasporas and the Hype of Hybridity
- 1 October 1997
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Environment and Planning D: Society and Space
- Vol. 15 (5) , 533-553
- https://doi.org/10.1068/d150533
Abstract
In a progressive attempt to find sites of resistance to dominant hegemonies of race and nation, many cultural theorists have begun to rely on notions of in-betweenness and ambivalence, and terms such as diaspora and hybridity, However, in much of this recent cultural criticism, these concepts have become increasingly disarticulated from history and political economy. The fetishization of these terms, and the general overuse of abstract spatial metaphors such as ‘third space’, can lead to theories and politics which neglect the everyday, grounded practices and economic relations in which social identities and narratives of race and nation unfold. Without denying the potential for resistance, it is argued in this paper that these abstract liminal spaces are easily appropriated by reactionary forces, and can be used for the purposes of capital accumulation quite as effectively as for the intervention in hegemonic narratives of race and nation.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Chinese History and the Question of OrientalismHistory and Theory, 1996
- Cities and CitizenshipPublic Culture, 1996
- Displacement, Diaspora, and Geographies of IdentityPublished by Duke University Press ,1996
- Immigrant ActsPublished by Duke University Press ,1996
- Between Europe and Asia: the Case of the Missing SequoiasEcumene, 1995
- DiasporasCultural Anthropology, 1994
- Los Dominicanyorks:The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1994
- Delineating Asian (Hong Kong) intellectuals: Speculations on intellectual problematics and post/colonialityThird Text, 1994
- Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural EconomyPublic Culture, 1990
- Putting Hierarchy in Its PlaceCultural Anthropology, 1988