Comparison of the Digene HC2 Assay and the Roche AMPLICOR Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Test for Detection of High-Risk HPV Genotypes in Cervical Samples
- 1 June 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Vol. 44 (6) , 2141-2146
- https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.00049-06
Abstract
Many different methods with different sensitivity and specificity have been proposed to detect the presence of high-risk human papillomavirus (HR HPV) in cervical samples. The HC2 is one of the most widely used. Recently, a new standardized PCR-based method, the AMPLICOR HPV test, has been introduced. Both assays recognize the same 13 HR HPV genotypes. The performances of these two commercially available assays were compared in 167 consecutive women (for a total of 168 samples) who presented at the Colposcopy Clinic either for a follow-up or for a diagnostic visit. Concordant results were found in 140/168 cervical samples (overall agreement, 83%; Cohen9s kappa = 0.63). Twenty-eight samples gave discordant results: 20 were positive with the AMPLICOR HPV test and negative with the HC2 assay, and 8 were negative with the AMPLICOR HPV test and positive with the HC2 assay. The genotyping showed that no HR HPV was detected in the 8 HC2 assay-positive AMPLICOR HPV test-negative samples, while in 8/20 AMPLICOR HPV test-positive HC2 assay-negative samples, an HR HPV genotype was found. The AMPLICOR HPV test scored positive in a significantly higher percentage of subjects with normal Pap smears. All 7 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 patients scored positive with the AMPLICOR HPV test, while 2 of them scored negative with HC2. Both tests had positive results in the only patient with squamous cell carcinoma. In conclusion, this study shows that the HC2 assay and the AMPLICOR HPV test give comparable results, with both being suitable for routine use. The differences noted in some cases may suggest a different optimal clinical use.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Elevated 10-Year Risk of Cervical Precancer and Cancer in Women With Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Type 16 or 18 and the Possible Utility of Type-Specific HPV Testing in Clinical PracticeJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2005
- Human Papillomavirus Type 16 Infections and 2-Year Absolute Risk of Cervical Precancer in Women With Equivocal or Mild Cytologic AbnormalitiesJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2005
- Triage with human papillomavirus testing of women with cytologic abnormalities prompting referral for colposcopy assessmentCancer, 2004
- Interlaboratory Reliability of Hybrid Capture 2American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 2004
- Epidemiologic Classification of Human Papillomavirus Types Associated with Cervical CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- High‐risk HPV testing in women with borderline and mild dyskaryosis: long‐term follow‐up data and clinical relevanceThe Journal of Pathology, 2001
- PCR based high risk HPV testing is superior to neural network based screening for predicting incident CIN III in women with normal cytology and borderline changesJournal of Clinical Pathology, 2000
- Human Papillomavirus Testing for Triage of Women With Cytologic Evidence of Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions: Baseline Data From a Randomized TrialJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2000
- HPV testing in primary screening of older womenBritish Journal of Cancer, 1999
- Prevalence of Human Papillomavirus in Cervical Cancer: a Worldwide PerspectiveJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1995