The Diagnosis and Prognosis of Schistosomiasis 1
- 1 November 1949
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene in The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
- Vol. s1-29 (6) , 945-958
- https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.1949.s1-29.945
Abstract
Schistosomiasis can be recognised in the majority of instances, although in many the demonstration of eggs is not easy. The diagnosis rests ultimately on the finding of ova or of certain conclusive or highly suggestive signs of the disease. Diagnostic criteria, such as the intradermal reaction, the blood eosinophilia and the formol gel test, occupy a useful place in its recognition. Nevertheless, it is my experience that they are of limited value and their results in any particular case should only be accepted after careful consideration of the clinical data available. The blood eosinophilia is a pointer to the presence of the disease but its absence should not exclude it. In my experience, about 50 per cent of bilharzial cases do not show an eosinophilia. Further, even when it is present it may be due to other causes. The intradermal skin test, if positive, is a factor pointing to the presence of the disease.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bilharzial Disease of the Bladder as Determined at Autopsy, with Particular Reference to its Diagnosis by Mucosal SnipsThe American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 1948
- The Diagnosis of Schistosomiasis Mansoni by a Rectal Biopsy Technique 1The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 1946
- The pathogenesis of pulmonary schistosomiasis in Egypt with special reference to Ayerza's diseaseThe Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology, 1938
- Observations on the incidence of malignant disease in South African nativesThe Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology, 1934