Empirical Matching Functions: Estimation and Interpretation Using State-Level Data
- 1 February 2000
- journal article
- Published by MIT Press in The Review of Economics and Statistics
- Vol. 82 (1) , 93-102
- https://doi.org/10.1162/003465300558669
Abstract
Using quarterly data to estimate state-level matching functions, we obtain point estimates that are slightly higher than are found with national gross flows data, likely because of inherent differences in the data sources. We also estimate matching functions separately by the source of the new hire, and show that the results are consistent with the assumptions of endogenous job search by the employed and a preference for employed applicants by firms. Thus, care must be taken in interpreting empirical matching functions, which are likely a reduced-form combination of a structural matching function and a job competition model. © 2000 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyKeywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Relative Efficiencies and Comparative Advantages in Job SearchJournal of Labor Economics, 1996
- Ranking, Unemployment Duration, and WagesThe Review of Economic Studies, 1994
- Why Do Countries and Industries with Large Seasonal Cycles Also Have Large Business Cycles?The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1992
- Recent Trends in Insured and Uninsured Unemployment: Is There an Explanation?The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1991
- Job Search Outcomes for the Employed and UnemployedJournal of Political Economy, 1990
- The Cyclical Behavior of the Gross Flows of U.S. WorkersBrookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1990
- The Seasonal Cycle and the Business CycleJournal of Political Economy, 1989
- The Beveridge CurveBrookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1989
- Help-Wanted Advertising, Job Vacancies, and UnemploymentBrookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1987
- Estimating Gross Labor-Force FlowsJournal of Business & Economic Statistics, 1985