Who Still Prefers Aggressive Surgery for Breast Cancer?
- 1 September 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of internal medicine (1960)
- Vol. 147 (9) , 1543-1547
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1987.00370090023004
Abstract
• Conservative breast surgery and modified radical mastectomy may, according to recent reports, yield equivalent survival. Analysis of a 1985 Canada-wide study (N=228) compared surgeons and oncologists still recommending modified radical mastectomy (30%) with those recommending less aggressive surgery (69%) for a hypothetical stage I patient. The groups did not differ significantly in most physician characteristics, estimated survival and cure probabilities, importance of most treatment goals, uncertainty about treatment choice, or most attitudinal responses. Although equally involved with and cognizant of the value of clinical trials, the modified radical group expressed more skepticism about the ability of trial results to be transferred to practice and to take sufficient account of patient uniqueness, indicating greater focus on variation than mean results. Trial results might be more readily adopted if they are reported in accessible databases, incorporating patient characteristics potentially relevant to treatment choice. This would allow clinicians to individualize treatment by analyzing patient subsets of their own choosing. (Arch Intern Med 1987;147:1543-1547)This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Improved understanding of mammary cancerCancer, 1986
- Breast cancer 1985: What have we learned?Cancer, 1986
- Limited Surgery and Radiotherapy for Early Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- Breast cancer: postoperative radiation therapy.Radiology, 1985
- Conservative treatment of breast cancer with the QU.A.RT. techniqueWorld Journal of Surgery, 1985
- Applying results of randomised trials to clinical practice: impact of losses before randomisation.BMJ, 1984
- Evaluating the benefit of clinical trials to future patientsControlled Clinical Trials, 1984
- An Additional Basic Science for Clinical Medicine: II. The Limitations of Randomized TrialsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1983
- Assessment of the role of randomized clinical trials in establishing treatment policiesControlled Clinical Trials, 1982
- RANDOMISED COMPARATIVE STUDIES IN THE TREATMENT OF CANCER IN THE UNITED KINGDOM: ROOM FOR IMPROVEMENT?The Lancet, 1979