A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing coronary artery bypass graft with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: one- to eight-year outcomes
Top Cited Papers
- 15 April 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Vol. 41 (8) , 1293-1304
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00157-8
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of Coronary-Artery Bypass Surgery and Stenting for the Treatment of Multivessel DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Stenting to Internal Mammary Artery Grafting for Proximal, Isolated De Novo Left Anterior Coronary Artery Stenosis: The SIMA TrialMayo Clinic Proceedings, 2000
- Seven-year outcome in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) by treatment and diabetic statusJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2000
- An Assessment of Methods to Combine Published Survival CurvesMedical Decision Making, 2000
- Three-year follow-up of the argentine randomized trial of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass surgery in multivessel disease (ERACI)Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1996
- A meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing coronary artery bypass grafting with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in multivessel coronary artery diseaseThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1995
- A Randomized Trial Comparing Coronary Angioplasty with Coronary Bypass SurgeryNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Coronary angioplasty versus left internal mammary artery grafting for isolated proximal left anterior descending artery stenosisThe Lancet, 1994
- Coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass surgery: the Randomised Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA) trialThe Lancet, 1993
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986