Comparison of two direct-count techniques for enumerating aquatic bacteria
- 1 May 1977
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Vol. 33 (5) , 1229-1232
- https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.33.5.1229-1232.1977
Abstract
Planktonic bacteria from an estuary were concentrated on membrane filters and counted with both a scanning electron microscope and an epi-illuminated fluorescent microscope. Counts on 0.2 micron Nuclepore filters (polycarbonate) were significantly higher (P less than 0.001) than counts on 0.2-micron Sartorius filters (cellulose). In contrast, there was not a statistically significant difference between the two techniques when Nuclepore filters were used (0.5 less than P less than 0.9). The average cell volume from this study area was 0.047 micron3. The estimated number of bacteria ranged from 10(6) to 10(7) bacteria per ml, representing from 4 to 40 mg of C per m3.This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Use of nuclepore filters for counting bacteria by fluorescence microscopyApplied and Environmental Microbiology, 1977
- Determination of bacterial number and biomass in the marine environmentApplied and Environmental Microbiology, 1977
- Contribution of bacteria to standing crop of coastal plankton1Limnology and Oceanography, 1976
- Specimen holder to critical-point dry microorganisms for scanning electron microscopy.1974
- Scanning electron microscopy of microbial cells on membrane filters.1972
- Stereoscan Electron Microscopy of Soil MicroorganismsScience, 1967
- Novel Filter for Biological MaterialsScience, 1964