Between Two Extremes: Mitochondrial DNA is neither the Panacea nor the Nemesis of Phylogenetic and Taxonomic Inference
Open Access
- 1 December 2005
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Systematic Biology
- Vol. 54 (6) , 952-961
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150500234674
Abstract
Recently, the role of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequences in taxonomy and phylogenetic inference has become contentious, and two extreme viewpoints have emergedKeywords
This publication has 68 references indexed in Scilit:
- Conservation implications of complex population structure: lessons from the loggerhead turtle (Caretta caretta)Molecular Ecology, 2005
- The incomplete natural history of mitochondriaMolecular Ecology, 2003
- Is morphology still relevant?Published by Springer Nature ,2002
- Phylogenetic Utility of Different Types of Molecular Data Used to Infer Evolutionary Relationships among Stalk-Eyed Flies (Diopsidae)Systematic Biology, 2001
- PHYLOGEOGRAPHY OF THE TRUMPETFISHES (AULOSTOMUS): RING SPECIES COMPLEX ON A GLOBAL SCALEEvolution, 2001
- MITOCHONDRIAL DNA PHYLOGEOGRAPHY OF THE POLYTYPIC NORTH AMERICAN RAT SNAKE (ELAPHE OBSOLETA): A CRITIQUE OF THE SUBSPECIES CONCEPTEvolution, 2000
- PhylogeographyPublished by JSTOR ,2000
- Multiple Sources of Character Information and the Phylogeny of Hawaiian DrosophilidsSystematic Biology, 1997
- Partitioning and Combining Data in Phylogenetic AnalysisSystematic Biology, 1993
- Rapid evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1979