Coming of age in family therapy talk: Perspective setting in multiparty problem formulations
- 1 March 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Discourse Processes
- Vol. 21 (2) , 191-212
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539609544955
Abstract
Family therapy talk is a rich arena for intergenerational negotiations about family problems and adolescents’ privileges. Such negotiations are discussed here in terms of multiparty problem formulations that raise basic questions about who is entitled to diagnose adolescents’ “problems.” In therapy sequences, it is shown how adolescents’ problems are formulated in terms of blame allocations. On an underlying level, diagnostic negotiations also concern participant status; that is, who will be seen as a full participant and who will be cast as a peripheral participant or nonperson in family talk. In three case studies, it is demonstrated how the therapist acts as an orchestrator of therapy talk, reformulating problems in setting new perspectives between parents and children. In this reformulation process, therapists use a series of discursive strategies that exploit obliqueness in multiparty audience design.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Family Narrative as Political ActivityDiscourse & Society, 1992
- Storytelling as a theory‐building activityDiscourse Processes, 1992
- Blame–account sequences in therapy: The negotiation of relational meaningsSemiotica, 1990
- Making family therapy work: Research findings and family therapy practiceJournal of Family Therapy, 1990
- Cats, dogs, and sweets in the clinical negotiation of reality: On politeness and coherence in pediatric discourseLanguage in Society, 1989
- Circumspection in psychotherapy: Structures and strategies of counselor-client interactionSemiotica, 1987
- Felicity's ConditionAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1983
- The Interaction Order: American Sociological Association, 1982 Presidential AddressAmerican Sociological Review, 1983
- AccountsAmerican Sociological Review, 1968
- The Number of Members as Determining the Sociological Form of the Group. IAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1902