Are Selling, General, and Administrative Costs “Sticky”?
Top Cited Papers
- 20 January 2003
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Accounting Research
- Vol. 41 (1) , 47-63
- https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679x.00095
Abstract
A fundamental assumption in cost accounting is that the relation between costs and volume is symmetric for volume increases and decreases. In this study, we investigate whether costs are “sticky”—that is, whether costs increase more when activity rises than they decrease when activity falls by an equivalent amount. We find, for 7,629 firms over 20 years, that selling, general, and administrative (SG&A) costs increase on average 0.55% per 1% increase in sales but decrease only 0.35% per 1% decrease in sales. Our analysis compares the traditional model of cost behavior in which costs move proportionately with changes in activity with an alternative model in which sticky costs occur because managers deliberately adjust the resources committed to activities. We test hypotheses about the properties of sticky costs and how the degree of stickiness of SG&A costs varies with firm circumstances.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Accuracy of Proportional Cost Models: Evidence from Hospital Service DepartmentsReview of Accounting Studies, 1997
- Are overhead costs strictly proportional to activity?Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1994
- Fundamental Information AnalysisJournal of Accounting Research, 1993
- An Analysis of the use of Accounting and Market Measures of Performance in Executive Compensation ContractsJournal of Accounting Research, 1987
- Several Tests for Model Specification in the Presence of Alternative HypothesesEconometrica, 1981
- Regression DiagnosticsPublished by Wiley ,1980
- A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for HeteroskedasticityEconometrica, 1980
- Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structureJournal of Financial Economics, 1976
- Estimates of Parameters of a Censored Regression SampleJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1972
- TESTING FOR SERIAL CORRELATION IN LEAST SQUARES REGRESSION. IIBiometrika, 1951