New treatments for advanced cancer: an approach to prioritization
Open Access
- 1 November 2000
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in British Journal of Cancer
- Vol. 83 (10) , 1268-1273
- https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1406
Abstract
The allocation of funding for new anticancer treatments within the UK has not kept pace with demand. Clinicians find themselves restricted in the use of licensed drugs which they feel are in the best interests of individual patients. Against this, health authorities have a duty to ensure that scarce resources are used equitably to meet the needs of the local population as a whole. Differential levels of funding for new treatments across the country have led to concerns about rationing by postcode. This paper outlines an approach to the prioritization of new treatment for advanced cancer developed jointly by clinicians and health authorities in South London. The approach involves evidence reviews and consensus meetings. Existing and new treatments are rated on a four-point ‘relative effectiveness scale’, which takes account of the impact of the treatment on quality of life and on survival. The strength of evidence supporting each effectiveness rating is also classified. Health Authorities have used these ratings to determine overall funding levels, while leaving decisions on individual patients to the relevant Trusts. © 2000 Cancer Research CampaignKeywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Perspectives of commissioners and cancer specialists in prioritising new cancer drugs: impact of the evidence thresholdBMJ, 1999
- Do patients with advanced breast cancer benefit from chemotherapy?British Journal of Cancer, 1998
- Preferences for chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: descriptive study based on scripted interviewsBMJ, 1998
- The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A Quality-of-Life Instrument for Use in International Clinical Trials in OncologyJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1993
- Measuring psychological and physical distress in cancer patients: structure and application of the Rotterdam Symptom ChecklistBritish Journal of Cancer, 1990
- Attitudes to chemotherapy: comparing views of patients with cancer with those of doctors, nurses, and general public.BMJ, 1990
- Quality of life during cytostatic therapy for advanced symptomatic colorectal carcinoma: a randomized comparison of two regimensEuropean Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology, 1989
- Quality of Life of Lung Cancer Patients in a Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluated by a Psychosocial Well-Being QuestionnaireActa Oncologica, 1988
- Improving the Quality of Life during Chemotherapy for Advanced Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- A comparison of subjective responses in a trial comparing endocrine with cytotoxic treatment in advanced carcinoma of the breast.1980