FOCUSSED ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY ARRAYS: SOME THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL EXPERIMENTS*
- 1 August 1981
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Geophysical Prospecting
- Vol. 29 (4) , 601-626
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1981.tb00698.x
Abstract
The “Laterolog 7′’and the “Microlaterolog’ have been studied theoretically for the case of a conducting halfspace containing a single overburden, using a technique based on the method of images. The results have shown these focussed arrays to be more sensitive to the lower medium (i.e., having greater depth of investigation) than unfocussed ones of the same dimensions, when the “correct’ geometric factor is used. The geometric factor of a focussed electrode array is somewhat involved, and is explained with reference to an ideal focussed array; such an array would pass a measuring current of constant intensity into a fixed geometrical shape of conducting material, irrespective of any layering or any other heterogenities that may be present, using auxiliary current sources of variable magnitude. This concept of a constant amount of current flowing in a beam of fixed geometry and current density, is the basis of focussed arrays, and it is shown that the geometric factor, used to calculate the apparent resistivity, is the one derived when considering the homogeneous case. The value of the constant measuring current, alone, is used to convert the measured potential difference into a resistance, the ratio between this value and the combined intensities of the auxiliary current sources, for the homogeneous case, being incorporated into the geometric factor.Surprisingly good agreement was found between the theoretical models and practical experiments using a focussing seabed resistivity probe which is a substantial modification of the “Microlaterolog”. Both show similar deviations from the ideal case which are explained in terms of refraction at the overburden interface. All experiments indicated that focussed arrays have a greater depth of investigation than similar unfocussed ones for a single overburden, whether it be resistive or conductive.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Resistivity‐porosity‐particle shape relationships for marine sandsGeophysics, 1978
- THE CONCEPT OF APPARENT RESISTIVITY IN LATEROLOG 7*Geophysical Prospecting, 1977
- COMMENTS ON ‘NEW RESULTS IN RESISTIVITY WELL LOGGING’ BY A. ROY, AND ‘LABORATORY RESULTS IN RESISTIVITY LOGGING’ BY A. ROY AND A. APPARAO*Geophysical Prospecting, 1977
- COMMENTS ON “NEW RESULTS IN RESISTIVITY WELL LOGGING”*Geophysical Prospecting, 1976
- COMMENTS ON “NEW RESULTS IN RESISTIVITY WELL LOGGING”*Geophysical Prospecting, 1976
- THE NANOLOG, A NEW WAY TO LOG THE RESISTIVITY OF THE SEA FLOOR*Geophysical Prospecting, 1976
- LABORATORY RESULTS IN RESISTIVITY LOGGING*Geophysical Prospecting, 1976
- An electrical resistivity method for evaluating the in‐situ porosity of clean marine sandsMarine Geotechnology, 1975
- Shipboard And In-Situ Electrical Resitivity Logging Of Unconsolidated Marine SedimentsPublished by Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) ,1971
- Foundations of Potential TheoryPublished by Springer Nature ,1967