Comparison of Two High-Energy, Pulsed Carbon Dioxide Lasers in the Treatment of Periorbital Rhytides
- 1 June 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Dermatologic Surgery
- Vol. 22 (6) , 541-545
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.1996.tb00371.x
Abstract
Carbon dioxide (CO2) laser technology has expanded over the past 20 years from the production of precise excisional and cutting instruments to the recent development of high-energy, pulsed systems that allow for controlled tissue vaporization. These newest lasers permit removal of thin layers of skin with minimal damage to normal adjacent skin structures. The precise and reproducible nature of tissue destruction has led to a resurgence of interest in cutaneous resurfacing. To compare the clinical effectiveness, side effect profile, and postoperative course of two different high-energy, pulsed CO2 lasers (ultrapulse and surgipulse) in the treatment of periorbital rhytides. Ten patients with moderate to severe periorbital rhytides received laser treatment using the surgipulse CO2 laser on one side and the ultrapulse CO2 laser on the opposite periorbital region. Equivalent laser parameters and treatment conditions were used with both systems. Sequential clinical analyses were performed independently by two blinded assessors. In addition, optical profilometry measurements of silicone rubber skin surface casts were obtained before and after laser irradiation to determine skin texture changes. There was a 63% average clinical improvement of periorbital rhytides following surgipulse laser treatment and a mean improvement of 82% after ultrapulse laser irradiation. Skin surface texture in all laser-treated rhytides approximated those found in normal skin. An increased number of laser passes were required using the surgipulse system to effect the same clinical endpoints as the ultrapulse system. While both the surgipulse and ultrapulse high-energy CO2 laser systems can effectively improve periorbital rhytides, the ultrapulse system provides a slightly enhanced clinical response with fewer passes, presumably due to improved tissue vaporization.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ultrapulse CO2 laser ablation of xanthelasmaJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 1996
- Lateral thermal damage along pulsed laser incisionsLasers in Surgery and Medicine, 1990
- Thermal damage produced by high‐lrradiance continuous wave CO2 laser cutting of tissueLasers in Surgery and Medicine, 1990
- Optical profilometry: An objective method for quantification of facial wrinklesJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 1989
- Carbon dioxide laser treatment of chronic actinic cheilitisJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 1988
- Comparison of CO2 laser and electrosurgery in the treatment of rhinophymaJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 1988
- Pulsed CO2 laser tissue ablation: Effect of tissue type and pulse duration on thermal damageLasers in Surgery and Medicine, 1988
- Microscopically proven cure of actinic cheilitis by CO2 laserLasers in Surgery and Medicine, 1987
- Use of pulsed energy delivery to minimize tissue injury resulting from carbon dioxide laser irradiation of cardiovascular tissuesJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1986
- CARBON-DIOXIDE LASER FOR EXCISION OF BURN ESCHARSThe Lancet, 1971