A comparison of sub-bandage pressures produced with two multi-layer bandaging systems
- 1 October 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Mark Allen Group in Journal of Wound Care
- Vol. 8 (9) , 444-448
- https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.1999.8.9.26203
Abstract
Fourteen nurses with experience in the use of high-compression bandaging were asked to bandage the same limb with two different bandaging systems: the ‘Charing Cross’ four-layer regimen (System A), and a modified system incorporating two new bandages (System B). A sub-bandage pressure monitor was used to quantify the efficacy of the resulting bandaging for the two systems. The results indicated that there was no significant difference between site sub-bandage pressures achieved using the two bandaging systems. Sub-bandage pressure profiles, however, fluctuated with patient posture, the best profiles being obtained with System B and the patient in the sitting position.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Construction and calibration of a low-cost bandage pressure monitorJournal of Wound Care, 1998
- Using a bandage pressure monitor as an aid in improving bandaging skillsJournal of Wound Care, 1998
- Prospective Comparison of Healing Rates and Therapy Costs for Conventional and Four-Layer High-Compression Bandaging Treatments of Venous Leg UlcersPhlebology: The Journal of Venous Disease, 1998
- Risk Factors for Leg Ulcer Recurrence: A Randomized Trial of Two Types of Compression StockingAge and Ageing, 1995
- Venous Ulceration - Assessment and TreatmentJournal of Tissue Viability, 1993
- Community clinics for leg ulcers and impact on healing.BMJ, 1992
- Sustained compression and healing of chronic venous ulcers.BMJ, 1988
- Treatment of Chronic Leg Ulcers in the Community: A Comparative Trial of Scherisorb and IodosorbPhlebology: The Journal of Venous Disease, 1987