MORBIDITY IN MINOR GYNAECOLOGICAL SURGERY: A COMPARISON OF HALOTHANE, ENFLURANE AND ISOFLURANE
Open Access
- 1 November 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in British Journal of Anaesthesia
- Vol. 54 (11) , 1213-1215
- https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/54.11.1213
Abstract
A comparison was made between halothane, enflurane and isoflurane with regard to their suitability for minor gynaecological procedures in patients who would be leaving the hospital within 24 h of the anaesthetic. Seventy-five healthy patients were randomly allotted to one of three groups which received one of thete anaesthetics. In respect of patient acceptance and postoperative morbidity there were no significant differences between halothane and enflurane, but after isoflurane there was a significantly greater frequency of minor sequelae (headache, nausea, dizziness and coughing) and its pungent odour made it unacceptable to some patients.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Isoflurane and Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure in Neurosurgical PatientsAnesthesiology, 1981
- Postoperative sore throat: influence of tracheal tube lubrication versus cuff designCanadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 1980
- MORBIDITY AFTER DAY-CASE GYNAECOLOGICAL SURGERY: Comparison of enflurane with halothaneBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1979
- MORBIDITY IN GYNAECOLOGICAL DAY-CASE SURGERY: A comparison of two anaesthetic techniquesBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1979
- MORBIDITY OF DAY-CASE GYNAECOLOGICAL SURGERY: A comparison of thiopentone and AlthesinBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1979