Science and Medicine in Imperial China—The State of the Field
- 1 February 1988
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Duke University Press in Journal of Asian Studies
- Vol. 47 (1) , 41-90
- https://doi.org/10.2307/2056359
Abstract
Sinology and the history of science have changed practically beyond recognition in the past half-century. Both have become academic specialisms, with their own departments, journals, and professional societies. Both have moved off in new directions, drawing on the tools and insights of several disciplines. Although some sinologists still honor no ambition beyond explicating primary texts, on many of the field's frontiers philology is no more than a tool. Similarly, many technical historians now explore issues for which anthropology or systems analysis is as indispensable as traditional historiography.Keywords
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- TheCh'i-yao jang-tsai-chüehand its EphemeridesCentaurus, 1986
- Was there a Maunder Minimum?Nature, 1980
- THE WORK OF JOSEPH NEEDHAMPast & Present, 1980
- Some Recent Studies on the Confluence of Chinese and Western Intellectual HistoryJournal of the History of Ideas, 1979
- The Taoist BodyHistory of Religions, 1978
- On the Word "Taoist" as a Source of Perplexity. With Special Reference to the Relations of Science and Religion in Traditional ChinaHistory of Religions, 1978
- On the Significance of the Question "Did China Have Science?"Philosophy East and West, 1972
- The Forge and the Crucible: A PostscriptHistory of Religions, 1968
- ANCIENT CHINESE OBSERVATIONS OF SOLAR HALOES AND PARHELIAWeather, 1959
- The Chinese Science of Fate-CalculationFolklore Studies, 1946