Fore- and hindlimb proportions in Plio-Pleistocene hominids
- 30 June 1978
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in American Journal of Physical Anthropology
- Vol. 49 (1) , 15-22
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330490104
Abstract
Associated fore‐ and hindlimb parts of five individuals are known from the hominid Plio‐Pleistocene fossil collections in Africa. Four of these have been classified as Australopithecus and show definite evidence that in comparison with humans, forelimbs were relatively large and hindlimbs were relatively small. The fourth individual, placed in the genus Homo, has human proportions. These findings do not necessarily imply locomotor differences: the forelimbs may have been relatively long in Australopithecus simply because they were as yet not completely reduced from their generalized hominoid ancestral state.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- 40Ar/39Ar dating of the KBS Tuff in Koobi Fora Formation, East Rudolf, KenyaNature, 1976
- Fission-track dating of pumice from the KBS Tuff, East Rudolf, KenyaNature, 1976
- Hominid remains from Hadar, EthiopiaNature, 1976
- Affinities of Tertiary Hominoid FemoraFolia Primatologica, 1976
- Age of KBS Tuff in Koobi Fora Formation, East Rudolf, KenyaNature, 1975
- Dating of the rock succession containing fossil hominids at East Rudolf, KenyaNature, 1974
- Age Changes, Variability and Generic Differences in Body Proportions of Recent HominoidsFolia Primatologica, 1973
- The gait ofAustralopithecusAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1973
- Rumpfskelettlänge, Allometrien und Körperproportionen bei catarrhinen PrimatenFolia Primatologica, 1972
- An Ankle-Bone of the Ape-Man, Paranthropus robustusNature, 1943