A Double Blind, Randomized, Controlled Investigation of Electrodermal Testing in the Diagnosis of Allergies
- 1 September 1997
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Mary Ann Liebert Inc in The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine
- Vol. 3 (3) , 241-248
- https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.1997.3.241
Abstract
This investigation evaluates electrodermal (ED) testing in 41 polysymptomatic allergic patients. Electrodermal testing discriminated correctly 82% of the time between house dust mite and histamine (allergens) and saline or water (nonallergens) in our first study group involving 17 patients (p = 0.007). The second study involved 24 patients and used the same double-blind methodology discriminating 96% of the time between allergic and nonallergic substances (p = 0.000002). We conclude that ED testing is a reliable method of differentiating between allergic and nonallergic substances in the context of our study.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Scientific support for electrodiagnosisBritish Homoeopathic journal, 1991
- An assessment of treatment of migraine/headache syndrome in patients seen in private practiceBritish Homoeopathic journal, 1990
- Determination of neutralization point for allergic hypersensitivityBritish Homoeopathic journal, 1987
- Iatrogenic Illness on a General Medical Service at a University HospitalNew England Journal of Medicine, 1981
- The Role of latrogenic Disease in Admissions to Intensive CareJAMA, 1980