Studies of Female Urethral Pressure Profile. Part I. The Normal Urethral Pressure Profile
- 1 January 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 123 (1) , 64-69
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)55783-3
Abstract
The urethral pressure profile is influenced by the degree of patient relaxation, which explains marked variations in measured pressure values among normal subjects, as well as the frequent lack of reproducibility in a given subject. The quality of relaxation can be estimated by observing the difference between maximum resting and maximum holding pressures. The most reproducible parameters are the total urethral length, the length to the point of maximum pressure and the ratio of area to the point of maximum pressure over total area. Changes in intravesical volume do not produce significant differences in peak pressure, total area or area to maximum pressure. When subjects were asked to strain, the pressure in the proximal urethra increased by 60% of the intravesical pressure observed, even in the absence of a vesical neck opening.This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Influence of Vesical Distension on Urethral Resistance to Flow: the Collecting PhaseBritish Journal of Urology, 1975
- Urethral pressure profile: Standardization of technique and study of reproducibilityUrology, 1975
- The Urethral Continence Zone and its Relation to Stress IncontinenceJournal of Urology, 1974
- The Urethral Pressure Profile: Theoretical Considerations and Clinical ApplicationBritish Journal of Urology, 1974
- The Mechanics of the Urethra and of MicturitionBritish Journal of Urology, 1973
- Continuous flow cystometry and urethral pressure profile measurement with monitored intravesical pressure: A diagnostic and prognostic investigationUrological Research, 1973
- THE URETHRAL PRESSURE PROFILEBritish Journal of Urology, 1969
- INTRAURETHRAL AND INTRAVESICAL PRESSURES IN NORMAL AND STRESS-INCONTINENT WOMEN1967
- Stress Incontinence in Young Nulliparous WomenAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1954