Why Isn't Everyone a Bayesian?
- 1 February 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The American Statistician
- Vol. 40 (1) , 1-5
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1986.10475342
Abstract
Originally a talk delivered at a conference on Bayesian statistics, this article attempts to answer the following question: why is most scientific data analysis carried out in a non-Bayesian framework? The argument consists mainly of some practical examples of data analysis, in which the Bayesian approach is difficult but Fisherian/frequentist solutions are relatively easy. There is a brief discussion of objectivity in statistical analyses and of the difficulties of achieving objectivity within a Bayesian framework. The article ends with a list of practical advantages of Fisherian/frequentist methods, which so far seem to have outweighed the philosophical superiority of Bayesianism.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Maximum Likelihood and Decision TheoryThe Annals of Statistics, 1982
- The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling PlansPublished by Society for Industrial & Applied Mathematics (SIAM) ,1982
- Interactive Elicitation of Opinion for a Normal Linear ModelJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1980
- Assessing the accuracy of the maximum likelihood estimator: Observed versus expected Fisher informationBiometrika, 1978
- The Future of Statistics: A Bayesian 21st CenturyAdvances in Applied Probability, 1975