Ventricular arrhythmias in the acute and chronic phases after acute myocardial infarction. Effect of intervention with captopril.
- 1 July 1994
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 90 (1) , 101-107
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.90.1.101
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) are independent predictors of mortality in survivors of myocardial infarction (MI), and they are more likely to be induced in dilated hearts with increased wall stress. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have been shown to prevent progressive dilation of the left ventricle after MI. METHODS AND RESULTS: The effects of captopril were evaluated in 58 patients with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction after MI. Patients were randomized on day 7 to either placebo or captopril (50 mg daily) in a double-blind parallel study over a period of 6 months. Patients were followed up by means of ambulatory ECG monitoring and echocardiography. There was a significant increase in VA in the placebo group (P < .05) in contrast to a significant decrease in the captopril group (P < .05). As a consequence, there was a significant between-group difference after 6 months (P < .05). Furthermore, the number of patients without VA at baseline who presented with this at the completion of the study was 6% in the captopril group versus 38% in the placebo group (P < .05). At baseline as well as at the termination of the study, LV end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI) and LV end-systolic volume index (LVESVI) were significantly increased among patients with VA (P < .01). On day 180, both myocardial ischemia and an increase in the LVEDVI were independent predictors of VA; however, progressive dilation of the left ventricle was confined to the placebo patients with significant increases in the LVEDVI compared with the captopril group: 17% versus 0%, respectively (P < .01). Furthermore, the duration of ambulatory ST-segment depression was significantly longer in this group compared with the captopril group (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Dilation of the left ventricle and myocardial ischemia predict VA during both the acute and chronic phases after MI. In post-MI patients with LV dysfunction, captopril has a beneficial effect on both the number of complex VAs as well as the number of patients who develop VA during the chronic phase. This is in all probability mediated through effects on both LV remodeling, LV function, and myocardial ischemia in patients who are exposed to an increased risk of undergoing progressive dilation of the left ventricle.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects on ventricular arrhythmias of oral captopril and of oral mononitrate started early in acute myocardial infarction: results of a randomised placebo controlled trial.Heart, 1993
- Interaction between ventricular loading and repolarisation: relevance to arrhythmogenesis.Heart, 1992
- Preliminary Report: Effect of Encainide and Flecainide on Mortality in a Randomized Trial of Arrhythmia Suppression after Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Ventricular Fibrillation during Antiarrhythmic Drug TherapyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Effect of Captopril on Progressive Ventricular Dilatation after Anterior Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Aggravation of arrhythmia by antiarrhythmic drugs—Incidence and predictorsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1987
- Risk factors for sudden death after acute myocardial infarction: Two-year follow-upThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1984
- A Double-Blind Trial of Metoprolol in Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- Interaction of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors with the function of the sympathetic nervous systemThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1982
- Effectiveness of increasing hours of continuous ambulatory electrocardiography in detecting maximal ventricular ectopy: Continuous 48 hour study of patients with coronary heart disease and normal subjectsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1978