Trust, Coordination, and the Industrial Organization of Political Activism
Open Access
- 1 June 2003
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of the European Economic Association
- Vol. 1 (4) , 851-889
- https://doi.org/10.1162/154247603322493177
Abstract
We study political activism by several interest groups with private signals. When their ideological distance to the policymaker is small, a " low-trust" regime prevails: agents frequently lobby even when it is unwarranted, taking advantage of the coné rmation provided by others' activism; conversely, the policymaker responds only to generalized pressure. When ideological distance is large, a " high-trust" regime prevails: lobbying behavior is disciplined by the potential contradiction from abstainers, and the policymaker' s response threshold is correspondingly lower. Within some intermediate range, both equilibria coexist. We then study the optimal organization of inè uence activities, contrasting welfare levels when interest groups act independently and when they coordinate. (JEL: D72, D78, D82)Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Multiple Referrals and Multidimensional Cheap TalkEconometrica, 2002
- Allocating Access for Information and ContributionsJournal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 1998
- Information Aggregation, Rationality, and the Condorcet Jury TheoremAmerican Political Science Review, 1996
- Campaign Contributions and AccessAmerican Political Science Review, 1995
- Counteractive LobbyingAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1994
- Information and Influence: Lobbying for Agendas and VotesAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1993
- Interested Experts and Policy Advice: Multiple Referrals under Open RuleGames and Economic Behavior, 1993
- Information Transmission in DebateAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1990
- Coalition-Proof Nash Equilibria I. ConceptsJournal of Economic Theory, 1987
- Strategic Information TransmissionEconometrica, 1982