DETERMINANTS OF PAUSING UNDER VARIABLE‐RATIO SCHEDULES: REINFORCER MAGNITUDE, RATIO SIZE, AND SCHEDULE CONFIGURATION
- 1 July 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
- Vol. 50 (1) , 65-73
- https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1988.50-65
Abstract
Pigeons pecked a key under two‐component multiple variable‐ratio schedules that offered 8‐s or 2‐s access to grain. Phase 1 assessed the effects of differences in reinforcer magnitude on postreinforcement pausing, as a function of ratio size. In Phase 2, postreinforcement pausing and the first five interresponse times in each ratio were measured as a function of differences in reinforcer magnitude under equal variable‐ratio schedules consisting of different configurations of individual ratios. Rates were also calculated exclusive of postreinforcement pause times in both phases. The results from Phase 1 showed that as ratio size increased, the differences in pausing educed by unequal reinforcer magnitudes also increased. The results of Phase 2 showed that the effects of reinforcer magnitude on pausing and IRT durations were a function of schedule configuration. Under one configuration, in which the smallest ratio was a fixed‐ratio 1, pauses were unaffected by magnitude but the first five interresponse times were affected. Under the other configuration, in which the smallest ratio was a fixed‐ratio 7, pauses were affected by reinforcer magnitude but the first five interresponse times were not. The effect of each configuration seemed to be determined by the value of the smallest individual ratio. Rates calculated exclusive of postreinforcement pause times were, in general, directly related to reinforcer magnitude, and the relation was shown to be a function of schedule configuration.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- EFFECTS OF VARIATIONS IN LOCAL REINFORCEMENT RATE ON LOCAL RESPONSE RATE IN VARIABLE INTERVAL SCHEDULESJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1981
- INHIBITING FUNCTION OF REINFORCEMENT: MAGNITUDE EFFECTS ON VARIABLE‐INTERVAL SCHEDULES1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1978
- EFFECTS OF REINFORCEMENT MAGNITUDE ON INTERVAL AND RATIO SCHEDULES1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1974
- Functional Variables in Fixed Ratio Pausing with RabbitsThe Psychological Record, 1974
- The Post-Reinforcement Pause: A MisnomerThe Psychological Record, 1973
- A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE RESPONDING MAINTAINED BY INTERVAL SCHEDULES OF REINFORCEMENT1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1968
- PREFERENCE FOR MIXED‐ VERSUS FIXED‐RATIO SCHEDULES1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1967
- Temporal persistence of frustration effects in monkeys and ratsPsychonomic Science, 1966
- THE POST‐REINFORCEMENT PAUSE1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1966
- Schedules of reinforcement.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1957