Effects of nimodipine, Bay K 8644 and pinacidil on α1‐ and α2‐adrenoceptor‐mediated vasoconstriction in human hand veins

Abstract
The effects of nimodipine, Bay K 8644 and pinacidil, three drugs interfering with transmembrane Ca2+fluxes in different ways, were investigated in isolated human hand veins. Their ability to influence the concentration‐response relationship for noradrenaline (NA) was assessed in the absence and presence of prazosin or rauwolscine. The contractile response to NA was almost abolished in Ca2+‐free medium. Nimodipine and pinacidil depressed the NA concentration‐response curve both in the absence and presence of α‐adrenoceptor blockers. The NA response was only partially inhibited by nimodipine, indicating that NA may activate nimodipine‐insensitive influx pathways, presumably receptor‐operated calcium channels. Pinacidil inhibited the contractile response to 124 mM K+and reduced the NA‐induced contraction in the presence of nimodipine, suggesting that pinacidil has actions other than the opening of potassium channels and subsequent membrane hyperpolarization. Bay K 8644 increased the NA potency fourfold in the presence of rauwolscine, whereas it had no effect on the NA response in the presence of prazosin and in the absence of α‐adrenoceptor blockade. Such an action of Bay K 8644 can be reconciled with α‐adrenoceptor activation causing membrane depolarization and opening of potential‐operated calcium channels. It may be concluded that both α1‐ and α2‐adrenoceptor‐mediated contractions in human hand veins are highly dependent on Ca2+influx, although the mechanisms utilized to bring about this influx partly differ between the two receptor subtypes.