Comparative trial of a short workshop designed to enhance appropriate use of screening tests by family physicians.
- 26 November 2002
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Vol. 167 (11) , 1241-6
Abstract
Educational interventions that support the implementation of complex clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) require substantial time commitments from participants. We conducted a comparative study to evaluate if a 90-minute workshop would increase compliance with the recommendations of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care as well as decrease the ordering of tests not the subject of specific recommendations. Eighty-seven family physicians from Quebec participated in the study. Group assignment was initially randomized, but, owing to logistic problems, randomization was not maintained. After unannounced visits, 2 standardized patients coded the physicians' performance of 23 items recommended for inclusion in the periodic health examination (10 for men and 13 for women) and 8 items recommended for exclusion (4 for both men and women). The "exposed" physicians were visited within 4 to 6 months after the workshop. The "nonexposed" physicians were visited within 4 to 6 months after consent was obtained but before they attended the workshop. We used linear regression analysis to determine if exposure to the workshop resulted in improved performance. Exposure to the workshop was not associated with a difference in the adjusted mean score for items recommended for inclusion (12.07 for exposed physicians v. 12.35 for those not exposed; maximal and ideal score 23; r = -0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI] = -1.63 to 1.08). However, workshop exposure was associated with lower adjusted mean scores for items recommended for exclusion (1.55 v. 3.17; maximal score 8, ideal score 0; r = -1.63; 95% CI = -2.50 to -0.75) and for other tests (3.59 v. 6.53; r = -2.95; 95% CI = -5.10 to -0.79). A short workshop can decrease the ordering of unnecessary screening tests by family physicians. Given its low cost and its potential for general application, such an intervention can support the implementation of prevention CPGs.This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Practice guidelines for clinical prevention: do patients, physicians and experts share common ground?1999
- Getting research findings into practice: Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findingsBMJ, 1998
- Fielding standardized patients in primary care settings: lessons from a study using unannounced standardized patients to assess preventive care practices.International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 1998
- Implementing guidelines and innovations in general practice: which interventions are effective?1998
- Provision of preventive care to unannounced standardized patients.1998
- Use of standardized patients in the assessment of medical practice.1998
- Translating guidelines into practice. A systematic review of theoretic concepts, practical experience and research evidence in the adoption of clinical practice guidelines.1997
- Changing physician performance. A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategiesJAMA, 1995
- The accuracy of standardized patient presentationMedical Education, 1991
- Detecting alcoholism. The CAGE questionnaireJAMA, 1984