Comparative Policy towards Cultural Isolationists in Canada and Norway
- 1 October 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in International Political Science Review
- Vol. 13 (4) , 433-449
- https://doi.org/10.1177/019251219201300406
Abstract
Groups which have isolated themselves from participation in the processes of government because they do not wish to be influenced or coopted are called cultural isolationists. They are small in number, but still come into conflict with established governmental policies. Western democracies should be able to accommodate these groups, but while they tend to be responsive to interest group demands, they tend to ignore the demands of groups of this kind. The issues of conflict involving the Amish and Hutterites in Canada and the Sami in Norway are examined; and the responses of the states are identified. The similarities of the demand patterns and responses are considered in the conclusions.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- SOME DEVELOPMENTS IN THE DIFFUSION PATTERNS OF HUTTERITE COLONIESCanadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes, 1985
- Collective Entities and Moral Rights: Problems in Liberal-Democratic ThoughtThe Journal of Politics, 1982
- The Cultural Rights of PeoplesUniversal Human Rights, 1980
- Pluralism, Corporatism and the Role of the StateGovernment and Opposition, 1978
- The Individual, the State, and Ethnic Communities in Political TheoryWorld Politics, 1977
- The Pluralist StatePublished by Springer Nature ,1975
- America in Search of a New Ideal: An Essay on the Rise of PluralismHarvard Educational Review, 1974
- Social Pluralism and DemocracyAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1973
- Man and World Politics: The Psycho‐Cultural Interface*Journal of Social Issues, 1968
- American Business, Public Policy, Case-Studies, and Political TheoryWorld Politics, 1964