Three restricted forms of Epstein–Barr virus latency counteracting apoptosis in c-myc-expressing Burkitt lymphoma cells
- 3 October 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 103 (40) , 14935-14940
- https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0509988103
Abstract
Epstein–Barr virus (EBV), a human herpesvirus, transforms B cell growth in vitro through expressing six virus-coded Epstein–Barr nuclear antigens (EBNAs) and two latent membrane proteins (LMPs). In many EBV-associated tumors, however, viral antigen expression is more restricted, and the aetiological role of the virus is unclear. For example, endemic Burkitt lymphoma (BL) classically presents as a monoclonal, c-myc-translocation-positive tumor in which every cell carries EBV as an EBNA1-only (Latency I) infection; such homogeneity among EBV-positive cells, and the lack of EBV-negative comparators, hampers attempts to understand EBV9s role in BL pathogenesis. Here, we describe an endemic BL that was unusually heterogeneous at the single-cell level and, in early passage culture, yielded a range of cellular clones, all with the same c-myc translocation but differing in EBV status. Rare EBV-negative cells were isolated alongside EBV-positive cells displaying one of three forms of restricted latency: (i) conventional Latency I expressing EBNA1 only from a WT virus genome, (ii) Wp-restricted latency expressing EBNAs 1, 3A, 3B, 3C, and -LP only from an EBNA2-deleted genome, and (iii) a previously undescribed EBNA2+/LMP1− latency in which all six EBNAs are expressed again in the absence of the LMPs. Interclonal comparisons showed that each form of EBV infection was associated with a specific degree of protection from apoptosis. Our work suggests that EBV acts as an antiapoptotic rather than a growth-promoting agent in BL by selecting among three transcriptional programs, all of which, unlike the full virus growth-transforming program, remain compatible with high c-myc expression.Keywords
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Epstein–Barr virus-induced B-cell transformation: quantitating events from virus binding to cell outgrowthJournal of General Virology, 2005
- Epstein-Barr Virus Nuclear Antigen 2 (EBNA2) Gene Deletion Is Consistently Linked with EBNA3A, -3B, and -3C Expression in Burkitt's Lymphoma Cells and with Increased Resistance to ApoptosisJournal of Virology, 2005
- EBNA2 Is Required for Protection of Latently Epstein-Barr Virus-Infected B Cells against Specific Apoptotic StimuliJournal of Virology, 2004
- B cells under influence: transformation of B cells by Epstein–Barr virusNature Reviews Immunology, 2003
- c-MYC: more than just a matter of life and deathNature Reviews Cancer, 2002
- Induction of apoptosis by chemotherapeutic drugs: the role of FADD in activation of caspase-8 and synergy with death receptor ligands in ovarian carcinoma cellsCell Death & Differentiation, 2002
- Antagonistic effects ofc-myc and Epstein-Barr virus latent genes on the phenotype of human B cellsInternational Journal of Cancer, 2001
- The Expression Pattern of Epstein-Barr Virus Latent Genes In Vivo Is Dependent upon the Differentiation Stage of the Infected B CellImmunity, 2000
- Activation of Epstein–Barr virus latent genes protects human B cells from death by apoptosisNature, 1991
- The Pathogenesis of Burkitt's LymphomaPublished by Elsevier ,1990