Underestimation of Dose - Response Relationship with Particular Reference to the Relationship between the Dietary Intake of Mercury and its Concentration in Blood
- 1 March 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Human Toxicology
- Vol. 7 (2) , 129-132
- https://doi.org/10.1177/096032718800700204
Abstract
Wide discrepancies have been observed between controlled and uncontrolled intake studies of the relationship of blood mercury concentration to intake of mercury. The probable reason for the apparent discrepancies is that the within-subject variation of mercury intake in the uncontrolled studies was almost certainly considerably larger than the within-subject variation in blood mercury concentration; in these circumstances, the apparent slope obtained from a linear regression of blood mercury on intake will invariably be much smaller than the true slope. Studies of the exposure or intake of any substance should therefore include a consideration of the likely within-subject variation in the exposure or intake relative to that in the effect.This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Elevation of Mercury in Human Blood from Controlled Chronic Ingestion of Methylmercury in FishHuman Toxicology, 1984
- Duplication Diet Study on Mercury Intake by Fish Consumers in the United KingdomArchives of environmental health, 1982
- The Relationship between Blood Levels and Dose of Methylmercury in ManArchives of environmental health, 1980
- Duplicate diet study on fishing communities in the United Kingdom: Mercury exposure in a “critical group”Environmental Research, 1979
- Methylmercury exposure, mercury levels in blood and hair, and health status in Swedes consuming contaminated fishToxicology, 1974
- Studies on Humans Exposed to Methyl Mercury Through Fish ConsumptionArchives of environmental health, 1972