Glottal transparency
- 1 May 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Phonology
- Vol. 10 (1) , 107-138
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675700001755
Abstract
Glottal consonants (/h/ and /?/) often have a special status that has led to the hypothesis that they are underspecified for both consonant and vowel place of articulation features. There is an alternative acoustically based explanation for the special status that, while workable, is valued less highly in linguistic theory. This alternative hypothesis can be ruled out only with data where the relevant acoustic phenomena are not contained in the input to be learned. I address four processes of consonant and vowel harmony in the speech of three children learning English, where the alternative hypothesis cannot account for the data. I conclude that glottals are underspecified for consonant and vowel place of articulation features, and that they lack the node in feature geometry that immediately dominates such features (either the Place node or an Oral node).Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Performance Constraint on Compensatory Lengthening in Child PhonologyLanguage and Speech, 1992
- Radical underspecification in language productionPhonology, 1991
- Apparent anti-frequency effects in language production: The Addition Bias and phonological underspecificationJournal of Memory and Language, 1991
- The phonetics and phonology of aspects of assimilationPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1990
- Segment structure and coronal underspecificationPhonology, 1989
- On coronal transparencyPhonology, 1989
- Cross-language speech perception: Initial capabilities and developmental change.Developmental Psychology, 1988
- Prelinguistic Vocalizations of Hearing-Impaired and Normally Hearing SubjectsJournal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1988
- Between-word processes in child phonologyJournal of Child Language, 1988
- Phonological development from babbling to speech: Common tendencies and individual differencesApplied Psycholinguistics, 1986