Why 2×2=5 looks so wrong: On the odd-even rule in product verification
- 1 March 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Memory & Cognition
- Vol. 14 (2) , 141-149
- https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03198374
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- The internal representation of numbersPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Why 2 + 2 = 5 looks so wrong: On the odd-even rule in sum verificationMemory & Cognition, 1984
- Cognitive arithmetic: Comparison of operations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1984
- Plausibility judgments versus fact retrieval: Alternative strategies for sentence verification.Psychological Review, 1982
- Menatal addition: A test of three verification modelsMemory & Cognition, 1981
- A theory of perceptual matching.Psychological Review, 1978
- Semantic congruity effects in comparative judgments of magnitudes of digits.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1976
- Associative confusions in mental arithmetic.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974
- Temporal aspects of simple multiplication and comparison.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972
- Speed of adding and comparing numbers.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970