Diagnosis of Lower-Limb Deep Venous Thrombosis: A Prospective Blinded Study of Magnetic Resonance Direct Thrombus Imaging
Top Cited Papers
- 15 January 2002
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American College of Physicians in Annals of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 136 (2) , 89-98
- https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-136-2-200201150-00006
Abstract
Current magnetic resonance techniques generate high signal from venous blood and show thrombi as filling defects. Magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging (MRDTI) directly visualizes acute thrombus. To determine the accuracy of MRDTI for diagnosis of acute symptomatic deep venous thrombosis (DVT) below and above the knee. Prospective, blinded study. A 1355-bed university hospital. 101 patients with suspected DVT who had had routine venography. Participants were recruited from a cohort of patients with suspected DVT. All patients with a positive venogram and one quarter of patients with a negative venogram were selected by using a random sequence. MRDTI was performed within 48 hours of venography and was interpreted by two reviewers. Diagnosis of DVT overall; isolated calf, femoropopliteal, and ileofemoral DVT; and thrombus in the calf, femoropopliteal, and iliac segments. The reports from two readers had sensitivities of 96% and 94% and specificities of 90% and 92% for diagnosis of DVT. Sensitivities were 92% and 83% for isolated calf DVT, 97% and 97% for femoropopliteal DVT, and 100% and 100% for ileofemoral DVT. Specificities were 94% and 96% for isolated calf DVT and 100% and 100% for both femoropopliteal and ileofemoral DVT. Similarly, sensitivity and specificity within each of the venous segments ranged from 91% to 100%. Interobserver variability measured by using a weighted κ statistic ranged from 0.89 to 0.98 for these measures. Magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging is an accurate noninvasive test for diagnosis of DVT, and its accuracy is maintained below the knee. Comparison of individual venous segments showed that results of MRDTI agreed strongly with findings on venography. Scanning was well tolerated, and interpretation was highly reproducible.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Deep Venous Thrombosis: Recent Advances and Optimal Investigation with USRadiology, 1999
- Non-invasive diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in outpatientsThe Lancet, 1999
- Lower-limb deep venous thrombosis: direct MR imaging of the thrombus.Radiology, 1998
- Gadolinium-enhanced body MR venography with subtraction technique.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1997
- The radiological investigation of suspected lower limb deep vein thrombosis.Clinical Radiology, 1997
- Diagnostic strategies for the management of patients with clinically suspected deep-vein thrombosisCurrent Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine, 1997
- Angiomagnetic resonance imaging of iliofemorocaval venous thrombosisThe Lancet, 1995
- Symptomatic lower extremity deep venous thrombosis: accuracy, limitations, and role of color duplex flow imaging in diagnosis.Radiology, 1990
- Adequacy of lower limb venous opacification:comparison of supine and upright phlebographyAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1980
- Observer variation in the interpretation of lower limb venogramsAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1979