Contribution to the quantitative analysis of neuronal parameters: The effects of biased sampling procedures on estimates of neuronal volume, surface area and packing density
- 15 March 1973
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Vol. 148 (2) , 217-228
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.901480207
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- A comparison of several methods for stereological determination of the numbers of organelles per unit volume of cytoplasmJournal of Microscopy, 1972
- Stereological methods in the analysis of neuronal parameters in the central nervous system*Journal of Microscopy, 1972
- Stereology, or the quantitative evaluation of microstructuresJournal of Microscopy, 1969
- A comparative analysis of methods of estimating the size of cell populations from microtome sectionsJournal of the Royal Microscopical Society, 1968
- A Comparison of Sampling Procedures in a Structured Cell PopulationPublished by Springer Nature ,1967
- A method for estimating the number of cells in histological sectionsJournal of the Royal Microscopical Society, 1965
- A SCHEME FOR SECTION STAINING IN ELECTRON MICROSCOPYJournal of the Royal Microscopical Society, 1963
- COMPONENT QUANTITATION OF TISSUE SECTIONS. II. A STUDY OF THE FACTORS WHICH INFLUENCE THE ACCURACY OF THE METHODJournal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry, 1962
- Estimation of nuclear population from microtome sectionsThe Anatomical Record, 1946
- A contribution to the technique of determining the number of nerve cells per volume unit of tissueThe Anatomical Record, 1941