A Comparative Study of Bovine Abortion and Undulant Fever, from the Bacteriological point of View
- 1 July 1921
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Epidemiology and Infection
- Vol. 20 (4) , 319-329
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022172400034045
Abstract
1. Morphologically B. abortus and B. melitensis are identical. The “coccoid” form is not a constant feature and a more satisfactory generic name would be “Brucella.”2. The organisms cannot be differentiated by cultural, bio-chemical, or staining methods, or by the agglutination reaction.3. From absorption experiments, it would appear that B. melitensis is a sub-strain of B. abortus.4. Dose for dose B. abortus is much less virulent for the guinea-pig than B. melitensis, approximately about 1: 6.5. Immunisation of monkeys (one experiment only) with killed suspensions of B. abortus protected against subsequent infection with B. melitensis.In conclusion I wish to thank Professor Ledingham for much valuable advice throughout the investigation, and Dr R. St John Brooks for supplying me with cultures from the National Collection.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Comparison of the Morphologic, Cultural and Biochemical Characteristics of B. Abortus and B. Melitensis: Studies on the Genus Brucella Nov. Gen. IThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1920
- Further Studies on Bacterium Abortus and Related Bacteria: II. A Comparison of Bacterium Abortus with Bacterium Bronchisepticus and with the Organism which Causes Malta FeverThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1918
- Is Bact. Abortus (Bang) Pathogenic for Human Beings?1916
- A Contribution to the Pathogenesis of B. Abortus, Bang.-II.1912