Will Volume-Based Referral Strategies Reduce Costs Or Just Save Lives?
- 1 September 2002
- journal article
- Published by Health Affairs (Project Hope) in Health Affairs
- Vol. 21 (5) , 234-241
- https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.21.5.234
Abstract
Although recent policy initiatives aimed at concentrating selected surgical procedures in high-volume hospitals may reduce mortality, their economic implications have not been considered fully. From the hospital perspective, the primary effect of these policies will be to redistribute surgical profits to bigger centers. From the payer perspective, prices paid for procedures will likely increase in some geographic areas. From the societal perspective, how these policies will affect the true cost of providing surgical care is uncertain, but use of discretionary procedures will likely increase. For these reasons, the primary argument for volume-based referral strategies should be improving quality, not reducing costs.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hospital Volume and Surgical Mortality in the United StatesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Selective Referral to High-Volume HospitalsJAMA, 2000
- Effects of Admission to a Teaching Hospital on the Cost and Quality of Care for Medicare BeneficiariesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Impact of Hospital Volume on Operative Mortality for Major Cancer SurgeryJAMA, 1998
- Do Nonprofit Hospitals Exercise Market Power?International Journal of the Economics of Business, 1998
- High-Technology Cardiac ProceduresPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1993
- Explaining Geographic VariationsMedical Care, 1993
- Does Inappropriate Use Explain Geographic Variations in the Use of Health Care Services?JAMA, 1987