Can we reduce the caesarean section rate?
- 1 February 2001
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology
- Vol. 15 (1) , 179-194
- https://doi.org/10.1053/beog.2000.0156
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is a rising caesarean section rate inevitable?BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1998
- The association of placenta previa with history of cesarean delivery and abortion: A metaanalysisAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1997
- What is the right number of caesarean sections?The Lancet, 1997
- Long-term effects of cesarean sections: Ectopic pregnancies and placental problemsAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1996
- Cesarean section delivery in the 1980's: International comparison by indicationAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1994
- What is the correct caesarean section rate?BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1993
- Determinants of caesarean section rates in ItalyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1992
- The relative risks of caesarean section (intrapartum and elective) and vaginal delivery: a detailed analysis to exclude the effects of medical disorders and other acute pre‐existing physiological disturbancesBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1990
- Comparisons of National Cesarean-Section RatesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- The Increase in the Cesarean Birth RateNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980