Acute respiratory distress syndrome 40 years later: Time to revisit its definition*
- 1 October 2008
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 36 (10) , 2912-2921
- https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0b013e31817d20bd
Abstract
Acute respiratory distress syndrome is a common disorder associated with significant mortality and morbidity. The aim of this article is to critically evaluate the definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome and examine the impact the definition has on clinical practice and research.Articles from a MEDLINE search (1950 to August 2007) using the Medical Subject Heading respiratory distress syndrome, adult, diagnosis, limited to the English language and human subjects, their relevant bibliographies, and personal collections, were reviewed.The definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome is important to researchers, clinicians, and administrators alike. It has evolved significantly over the last 40 years, culminating in the American-European Consensus Conference definition, which was published in 1994. Although the American-European Consensus Conference definition is widely used, it has some important limitations that may impact on the conduct of clinical research, on resource allocation, and ultimately on the bedside management of such patients. These limitations stem partially from the fact that as defined, acute respiratory distress syndrome is a heterogeneous entity and also involve the reliability and validity of the criteria used in the definition. This article critically evaluates the American-European Consensus Conference definition and its limitations. Importantly, it highlights how these limitations may contribute to clinical trials that have failed to detect a potential true treatment effect. Finally, recommendations are made that could be considered in future definition modifications with an emphasis on the significance of accurately identifying the target population in future trials and subsequently in clinical care.How acute respiratory distress syndrome is defined has a significant impact on the results of randomized, controlled trials and epidemiologic studies. Changes to the current American-European Consensus Conference definition are likely to have an important role in advancing the understanding and management of acute respiratory distress syndrome.Keywords
This publication has 99 references indexed in Scilit:
- B-type natriuretic peptide in the assessment of acute lung injury and cardiogenic pulmonary edema*Critical Care Medicine, 2006
- Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trialsPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Epidemiology of acute lung injuryCritical Care Medicine, 2003
- Incidence, clinical course, and outcome in 217 patients with acute respiratory distress syndromeCritical Care Medicine, 2002
- Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of lisofylline for early treatment of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndromeCritical Care Medicine, 2002
- Influence of direct and indirect etiology on acute outcome and 6-month functional recovery in acute respiratory distress syndromeCritical Care Medicine, 2001
- Prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing traditional versus reduced tidal volume ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome patientsCritical Care Medicine, 1999
- Liposomal prostaglandin E1 (TLC C-53) in acute respiratory distress syndromeCritical Care Medicine, 1999
- Variability of indices of hypoxemia in adult respiratory distress syndromeCritical Care Medicine, 1997
- The acute respiratory distress syndrome: Definitions, severity and clinical outcome An analysis of 101 clinical investigationsIntensive Care Medicine, 1996