Percent Agreement, Pearson's Correlation, and Kappa as Measures of Inter-examiner Reliability
- 1 February 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Dental Research
- Vol. 65 (2) , 128-130
- https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345860650020701
Abstract
Percent agreement and Pearson's correlation coefficient are frequently used to represent inter-examiner reliability, but these measures can be misleading. The use of percent agreement to measure inter-examiner agreement should be discouraged, because it does not take into account the agreement due solely to chance. Caution must be used in the interpretation of Pearson's correlation, because it is unaffected by the presence of any systematic biases. Analyses of data from a reliability study show that even though percent agreement and kappa were consistently high among three examiners, the reliability measured by Pearson's correlation was inconsistent. This study shows that correlation and kappa can be used together to uncover non-random examiner error.This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Weekly Rinsing with a Fluoride Mouthrinse in an Unfluoridated Community: Results after Seven YearsJournal of Public Health Dentistry, 1985
- Reproducibility of probing attachment level measurementsJournal of Clinical Periodontology, 1984
- Effect of fluoridation on dental health in 5‐and 11‐year‐old Irish schoolchildrenCommunity Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 1984
- The measurement of interexaminer agreement on periodontal diseaseJournal of Periodontal Research, 1983
- Interexaminer agreement in the measurement of periodontal diseaseJournal of Periodontal Research, 1982
- Inter-examiner Reliability in Caries TrialsJournal of Dental Research, 1979
- The effects of measurement errors on some multivariate procedures.American Journal of Public Health, 1977
- The Analysis of Contingency TablesPublished by Springer Nature ,1977
- On various intraclass correlation reliability coefficients.Psychological Bulletin, 1976
- Reproducibility of periodontal scores in clinical trialsJournal of Periodontal Research, 1974