Hysterectomy: variations in rates across small areas and across physicians' practices.
- 1 April 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Public Health Association in American Journal of Public Health
- Vol. 74 (4) , 327-335
- https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.74.4.327
Abstract
This analysis focuses on the practice of hysterectomy across 33 hospital catchment areas of 1 Canadian province, using claims data from the Manitoba health insurance system. Hysterectomy rates varied 5-fold across hospital areas. The availability of hospitals and physicians was unrelated to area rates, and there appeared to be no access barriers in the low-rate areas. High-rate areas were characterized by women who visited large numbers of differnt physicians and by having larger proportions of French, Polish and Italian residents (ethnic groups which are largely Catholic in Manitoba). Although women residents of high rate areas made somewhat more visits for gynecologic problems and had many more D and C (dilation and curretage of the uterus), this may be due as much to the practice style of physicians treating patients from these areas as to gynecologic need. Residents of high and medium-high rate areas are more likely to have hysterectomy-prone surgeons as their primary physicians. Such physicians appear both more likely to label their patients; conditons as gynecologic in origin and more likely to advise surgical intervention (both D and C and hysterectomy) once such conditions are diagnosed. Thus, a combination of patient and physician characteristics may explain much of the variation in small area hysterectomy rates, rather than narrowly defined medical need.This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Who Is the Primary Physician?New England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- Small-Area Variations in the Use of Common Surgical Procedures: An International Comparison of New England, England, and NorwayNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982
- Professional uncertainty and the problem of supplier-induced demandSocial Science & Medicine, 1982
- The Toss-upNew England Journal of Medicine, 1981
- What Is Unnecessary Surgery?The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly. Health and Society, 1979
- A national study of medical and surgical specialties. II. Description of the survey instrumentJAMA, 1978
- A national study of medical and surgical specialties. I. Background purpose, and methodologyPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1978
- The psychological effects of hysterectomy.Canadian Psychology / Psychologie canadienne, 1977
- A New Audit Procedure Applied to an Old Question: Is the Frequency of T&A Justified?Medical Care, 1977
- Small Area Variations in Health Care DeliveryScience, 1973